http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-05/rs/index.php
THIS ARTICLE IS AN EXCERT.
The Grazing Snails, Part I - Turbo, Trochus, Astraea, and Kin
Introduction:
Of the common reef aquarium animals, only the polychaete annelids, or so-called bristle worms, are more misunderstood and badly treated than the common snails that many aquarists put into their systems to graze on or remove algae. Relatively little thought generally goes into the choice of these animals and, judging from the questions asked, even less thought goes into their care. This maltreatment often results in significant mortality. But who cares, they're only snails, right?
The moral and ethical issues of treating living organisms as "disposable" aside, I care. Snails are fascinating, complex, and often beautiful animals. The evolutionary radiation of body form in animals that can be called "snail" is one of the life's most successful stories. Depending on which way the taxonomic estimate is made, there are an estimated 35,000 to 150,000 living species of snails. This makes the "lowly" snails the largest animal group other than insects. Reflecting this amazing diversity, they have occupied every terrestrial and aquatic habitat on Earth.
I will briefly discuss some of the major groups of the common grazing snails that are kept in aquaria to assist in the control of algae. I will cover a rather large assemblage of similar-looking snails commonly sold in the aquarium hobby. Their similarity of shell shape and internal structures is an indication that they are closely related and that they share many attributes in common. Their structural similarities allow an author to cover a lot of ground by generalizing and focusing on like attributes. However, in such situations, it is always worth the reader's time to remember that no two species have the same requirements. Each species is special and unique in its own attributes, and discussions of generalities can go only so far. So, read what I have to say with a critical eye. I will also cover several of these animals more specifically. This first major group contains those animals, often referred to by aquarists as Turbo, Trochus and Astraea grazers, is called by the scientists who study these animals, the "Superfamily Trochoidea." A superfamily is a large, inclusive, group containing many smaller groupings of superficially similar animals differing in characteristics, at the family level, that are generally considered to be relatively minor. Within the snails, such minor characters are often manifested in small differences in shell shape, operculum, and shell ornamentation.
The evolutionary interrelationships within mollusks have been the subject of much research within the last twenty or so years, and as a result the taxonomy of the whole phylum has been undergoing a set of major changes. Presently, these animals are taxonomically classified as being in species that taxonomists have placed in the Families Trochidae and Turbinidae of the Superfamily Trochoidea. That Superfamily is, in turn, placed in a larger group called an Order. The Ordinal name is uncertain at the present time as it is undergoing revision, but it is one of several orders within the Superorder Vetigastropoda of the Subclass Orthogastropoda. All of these, of course, are within the Class Gastropoda, which contains all the snails. One can refer to all of the grazers I will discuss in this column as Trochoidean snails.
Trochoidean gastropods include all the Turbo, Astraea, Trochus and related animals such as Margarites, Stomatella, Norrisia, and Tegula. There are many other snails that eat algae in aquaria, consequently the Trochoidea is not all-inclusive of grazers. It does not include the nerites, abalone, limpets, the ceriths, conchs, and some cowries. These latter animals are perfectly good algae-eating animals, but they are only very distantly related to the trochoidean grazers, and I will cover them in future columns.
Most, but not all, of the Trochoideans have shells that look rather similar; as they should if they are all closely related. It is, in a sense, this similarity that prompted this column, as these animals are often difficult for hobbyists to tell apart. Their similar shell shapes may sometimes be deceiving, though. Stomatella varia has a small, flattened, cap-shaped shell and tends to look like a slug. It is, however, a good Trochoidean snail. Nevertheless, the shell is decidedly an odd one for the group.
Malacology, or the scientific study of mollusks, began in the sixteenth century among the shell collections or "conchological cabinets" of the "gentlemen naturalists" of that period. These were individuals who had the considerable wealth necessary to indulge their whims by collecting sea shells and other marine oddities to include in their displays, which were often kept in large mansions. Incidentally, the study of corals started at the same time, as coral skeletons were among the items included in these collections. In time, these collections became the basis for many modern museum collections. At the time of the collection, however, the collectors had no consistent way to describe the shells that made up their collections, and over the course of about a century, malacology arose primarily as a way of identifying these shells. In the process, a rather complex and descriptive terminology developed, which allowed the discussion of the various aspects of snail shell shape. I will try to ignore most of this terminology, but some of it is inescapable in a discussion of closely-related snails, because in general, the most visible differences between species are related to differences in shell features.
Shell Shapes:
I think it is useful to start a discussion of a snail shell by considering the basic animal to be a slug, without a shell. Such an animal is essentially a mound of flesh that creeps along on a broad, flat foot. Now, consider that slug with a shell over the top. The shell would likely be rather shield- or cap-shaped, probably something like that found on a limpet. One of the characteristics of snails is that they grow primarily in a top-to-bottom, rather than a front-to-back or side-to-side, direction. In other words, as they add mass to their body, they get thicker, not longer or wider. This means they become taller, and higher off the substrate. Given such growth, the flat cap shell would change to look something like the shape seen in a flat, broad, ice-cream cone. Further growth would tend to make the shell have a truly conical shape, much like an ice-cream cone. If one pictures a small slug carrying a sharply pointed ice-cream cone shaped shell oriented vertically on its back, it is probably obvious that such a shell would be unstable. The way in which this instability was solved appears to have been by coiling the shell. Coiling makes many snail shells doubly conical. They are cones coiled in a conical manner. This coiling pattern creates a shell that is helically coiled; in other words, it's basically spiral in shape, but occupies three dimensions. Each complete 360° "lap" of the coil is called a whorl. The largest and last whorl contains the aperture into which the animal can withdraw, and is called the body whorl. The relative shape of the animal depends on three main factors: the shape of the aperture (which defines the shape of the whorl itself), the rate at which the whorl gets bigger, and the rate at which the aperture moves away from the coil's center. Varying those three factors together can produce all possible snail shell shapes. Fortunately, in the Trochoidean snails, there is not a lot of diversity in shell shape. In some respects, this is a problem, as they all tend to look a lot alike. On the other hand, it makes recognition of the basic Trochoidean pretty simple.
Turban snails tend to have rounded whorls, while trochids tend to have smooth-sided shells. Either shell type may have an umbilicus, a "belly button" or a pit on the underside of the shell caused by the coiling, or a callus, a calcareous plug filling the hole. The auriform shell is formed when the whorl enlarges very rapidly relative to the coiling rate and is found in animals such as Stomatella.
Internal Anatomy:
It is not for the shells, however, that we aquarists put these animals into our tank. To be succinct, we buy these snails for their grazing ability and dietary preferences. Snails, in general, and Trochoideans, in particular, are called "microphagous" feeders. This means they feed on small particulate materials. They get such materials by sweeping or rasping them off the substrate. This rasping ability is related to, and determined by, a structure found only in mollusks called the "radula." The radula (plural = radulae or radulas) is a projection arising from a pit in the bottom of the front part of the digestive tract, just inside the mouth. One side of the radula is covered with spiny projections. In their simplest forms, these spines are made of cuticular material, basically protein and chitin. Vertebrate teeth are also basically cuticular and are found in the mouth and, because of these similarities, the spines on a mollusk's "tongue" are called "radular teeth."
(CONT)
THIS ARTICLE IS AN EXCERT.
The Grazing Snails, Part I - Turbo, Trochus, Astraea, and Kin
Introduction:
Of the common reef aquarium animals, only the polychaete annelids, or so-called bristle worms, are more misunderstood and badly treated than the common snails that many aquarists put into their systems to graze on or remove algae. Relatively little thought generally goes into the choice of these animals and, judging from the questions asked, even less thought goes into their care. This maltreatment often results in significant mortality. But who cares, they're only snails, right?
The moral and ethical issues of treating living organisms as "disposable" aside, I care. Snails are fascinating, complex, and often beautiful animals. The evolutionary radiation of body form in animals that can be called "snail" is one of the life's most successful stories. Depending on which way the taxonomic estimate is made, there are an estimated 35,000 to 150,000 living species of snails. This makes the "lowly" snails the largest animal group other than insects. Reflecting this amazing diversity, they have occupied every terrestrial and aquatic habitat on Earth.
I will briefly discuss some of the major groups of the common grazing snails that are kept in aquaria to assist in the control of algae. I will cover a rather large assemblage of similar-looking snails commonly sold in the aquarium hobby. Their similarity of shell shape and internal structures is an indication that they are closely related and that they share many attributes in common. Their structural similarities allow an author to cover a lot of ground by generalizing and focusing on like attributes. However, in such situations, it is always worth the reader's time to remember that no two species have the same requirements. Each species is special and unique in its own attributes, and discussions of generalities can go only so far. So, read what I have to say with a critical eye. I will also cover several of these animals more specifically. This first major group contains those animals, often referred to by aquarists as Turbo, Trochus and Astraea grazers, is called by the scientists who study these animals, the "Superfamily Trochoidea." A superfamily is a large, inclusive, group containing many smaller groupings of superficially similar animals differing in characteristics, at the family level, that are generally considered to be relatively minor. Within the snails, such minor characters are often manifested in small differences in shell shape, operculum, and shell ornamentation.
The evolutionary interrelationships within mollusks have been the subject of much research within the last twenty or so years, and as a result the taxonomy of the whole phylum has been undergoing a set of major changes. Presently, these animals are taxonomically classified as being in species that taxonomists have placed in the Families Trochidae and Turbinidae of the Superfamily Trochoidea. That Superfamily is, in turn, placed in a larger group called an Order. The Ordinal name is uncertain at the present time as it is undergoing revision, but it is one of several orders within the Superorder Vetigastropoda of the Subclass Orthogastropoda. All of these, of course, are within the Class Gastropoda, which contains all the snails. One can refer to all of the grazers I will discuss in this column as Trochoidean snails.
Trochoidean gastropods include all the Turbo, Astraea, Trochus and related animals such as Margarites, Stomatella, Norrisia, and Tegula. There are many other snails that eat algae in aquaria, consequently the Trochoidea is not all-inclusive of grazers. It does not include the nerites, abalone, limpets, the ceriths, conchs, and some cowries. These latter animals are perfectly good algae-eating animals, but they are only very distantly related to the trochoidean grazers, and I will cover them in future columns.
Most, but not all, of the Trochoideans have shells that look rather similar; as they should if they are all closely related. It is, in a sense, this similarity that prompted this column, as these animals are often difficult for hobbyists to tell apart. Their similar shell shapes may sometimes be deceiving, though. Stomatella varia has a small, flattened, cap-shaped shell and tends to look like a slug. It is, however, a good Trochoidean snail. Nevertheless, the shell is decidedly an odd one for the group.
Malacology, or the scientific study of mollusks, began in the sixteenth century among the shell collections or "conchological cabinets" of the "gentlemen naturalists" of that period. These were individuals who had the considerable wealth necessary to indulge their whims by collecting sea shells and other marine oddities to include in their displays, which were often kept in large mansions. Incidentally, the study of corals started at the same time, as coral skeletons were among the items included in these collections. In time, these collections became the basis for many modern museum collections. At the time of the collection, however, the collectors had no consistent way to describe the shells that made up their collections, and over the course of about a century, malacology arose primarily as a way of identifying these shells. In the process, a rather complex and descriptive terminology developed, which allowed the discussion of the various aspects of snail shell shape. I will try to ignore most of this terminology, but some of it is inescapable in a discussion of closely-related snails, because in general, the most visible differences between species are related to differences in shell features.
Shell Shapes:
I think it is useful to start a discussion of a snail shell by considering the basic animal to be a slug, without a shell. Such an animal is essentially a mound of flesh that creeps along on a broad, flat foot. Now, consider that slug with a shell over the top. The shell would likely be rather shield- or cap-shaped, probably something like that found on a limpet. One of the characteristics of snails is that they grow primarily in a top-to-bottom, rather than a front-to-back or side-to-side, direction. In other words, as they add mass to their body, they get thicker, not longer or wider. This means they become taller, and higher off the substrate. Given such growth, the flat cap shell would change to look something like the shape seen in a flat, broad, ice-cream cone. Further growth would tend to make the shell have a truly conical shape, much like an ice-cream cone. If one pictures a small slug carrying a sharply pointed ice-cream cone shaped shell oriented vertically on its back, it is probably obvious that such a shell would be unstable. The way in which this instability was solved appears to have been by coiling the shell. Coiling makes many snail shells doubly conical. They are cones coiled in a conical manner. This coiling pattern creates a shell that is helically coiled; in other words, it's basically spiral in shape, but occupies three dimensions. Each complete 360° "lap" of the coil is called a whorl. The largest and last whorl contains the aperture into which the animal can withdraw, and is called the body whorl. The relative shape of the animal depends on three main factors: the shape of the aperture (which defines the shape of the whorl itself), the rate at which the whorl gets bigger, and the rate at which the aperture moves away from the coil's center. Varying those three factors together can produce all possible snail shell shapes. Fortunately, in the Trochoidean snails, there is not a lot of diversity in shell shape. In some respects, this is a problem, as they all tend to look a lot alike. On the other hand, it makes recognition of the basic Trochoidean pretty simple.
Turban snails tend to have rounded whorls, while trochids tend to have smooth-sided shells. Either shell type may have an umbilicus, a "belly button" or a pit on the underside of the shell caused by the coiling, or a callus, a calcareous plug filling the hole. The auriform shell is formed when the whorl enlarges very rapidly relative to the coiling rate and is found in animals such as Stomatella.
Internal Anatomy:
It is not for the shells, however, that we aquarists put these animals into our tank. To be succinct, we buy these snails for their grazing ability and dietary preferences. Snails, in general, and Trochoideans, in particular, are called "microphagous" feeders. This means they feed on small particulate materials. They get such materials by sweeping or rasping them off the substrate. This rasping ability is related to, and determined by, a structure found only in mollusks called the "radula." The radula (plural = radulae or radulas) is a projection arising from a pit in the bottom of the front part of the digestive tract, just inside the mouth. One side of the radula is covered with spiny projections. In their simplest forms, these spines are made of cuticular material, basically protein and chitin. Vertebrate teeth are also basically cuticular and are found in the mouth and, because of these similarities, the spines on a mollusk's "tongue" are called "radular teeth."
(CONT)
Last edited: